top of page
hoi.png

History

Five of the books researched by the students are historical of nature, i.e. they tell the history of a certain place or phenomenon. At the same time, they are completely unique and different, which is mainly reflected in their target audience, visible by their materiality and contents. Some of these books were clearly written for nobility or rich civilians because their printing process or binding must have been expensive and elaborate. Others are (re-)written for a larger or very specific audience. This results in five unique books that call for attention. You can read about the results of these analyses by clicking the respective books. 

Van Meerbeeck’s chronicle was written from a Catholic, moderately pro-Spanish perspective. It is a folio format and contains many engraved portraits. These portraits were not added to the book by the owner who had it bound, but instead we find an instruction to the binder where to add the engravings, so these were an intricate part of the prints. This heavily suggests it was written for wealthy people.

 

La grande chronique was written with an audience of nobles in mind, specifically royalist (Orangist) nobles. it consist of two big leather-bound volumes with many engraved portraits of nobles and gold tooled spines. It was written in French which was the language of the nobility at the time. This all suggests that it was written for nobles to read about themselves. Furthermore, the books link the Dutch nobility to the Batavian myth, unifying them as a warrior people. This is both reflected in the fact that it contains many engraved full-page images of these nobles in full armour and with their coat of arms and the fact that the Divisiekroniek has been included in the compiling of the work.

 

Lipsius’ comentary on the history of Tacitus was a real object of use for anyone who wanted to study the Annales. The simple binding and lack of decoration imply that it was probably not expansive. It is therefore a bit surprising that the copy at the KNIR does not have a lot of signs of use, except for a few annotations.

This copy of the Harlemias by Schrevelius is unremarkable in almost every single way. The binding is card board, paper and parchment is is copletely undecorated. The book block is simpel, with no decorations save for some simple initials and a single historiated initial. It is accompanied by a single engraving. From all the other bindings I found on the interwebs, this one was by far the most simple. How, then, this this copy travel all the way to Rome, and who was interested in its contents? The inside reveals some hints... but the overall story of this traveller remains a mystery.

 

This book is a combination of genaeology and heraldry, written after the seperation of the Northern and Southern Netherlands during the Dutch Revolt. In the Southern Netherlands, heraldry was reserved for the nobility, unlike in the Northern Netherlands, were many families developed their own coats of arms. the author of the book, although a Northerner, clearly dissaproves of this dispersion. Therefore, the book was probrably written for the nobility, which is also reflected in the qaulity of the book block and the presence of many prints, both wood cuts and copper engravings. These copper engravings are pressed on the same pages as the tekst, a rather expensive activity. Unfortunately, the binding has been completely lost and is replaced by a very simple 19th century card board binding.

© 2021 

bottom of page